Friday, August 6, 2010

ISA HK/China --- HK Tree News (Poor Quality Arborist Reports)

国内朋友请使用翻译软件阅读本文 (http://translate.google.com.hk/?hl=en&tab=wT#enzh-CN)。
*** Our weekly Station Mail is for the information of Station Members only, but Station Mail has given up copyright & can be freely circulated. For administrative reasons, comments from outsiders are usually not entertained & may be circulated within our system locally & overseas. Please note Station Mail is sometimes given in Blog at http://isahkchina.blogspot.com , although images are usually not attached due to size. ***

Dear Station Members,

The newspaper report below described how a senile Camphor Tree was destined to be felled by the management company in HK Island, but was halted by a local Tree Expert after he visited the tree & studied the Arborist Report so prepared by a local Arborist. The newspaper quoted that the Tree Expert as regarding the Arborist Report to be "Careless/Casual", & advised further expert opinion to be sought before taking any action. The relevant words of the report are given in blue beneath for reference. The newspaper further quoted doubt on the quality of the Arborist Reports in the market for communal accountability.

ISA HK/China tends to agree with the comment of this Tree Expert. The Station Manager has seen some very poor Arborist Reports in the market with personal opinion overriding scientific observation, & speculation without technical ground. Many Arborist Reports in our territory are written in bad English with wrong spelling & incorrect grammar, which will come out as an international laughing stock if exposed to western experts. Some of those who are filling in "Rating Report" would give marks without solid justification, but rather personal preferences without careful observation. This can lead to major challenge in Court if prompted by professional scrutiny.

International Arborist Report would usually come in 3 different formats: Form Report where the Arborist would provide rating & short comments; Letter Report where the judgment & observation are give in a letter reply; & then the sophisticated Booklet Report where every details of site, tree, testing & analysis, conclusion & recommendation are written down like a story book. It is this Booklet Report that our territory lacks expertise in writing.

Conventional wisdom in our territory would regard a Booklet Report of complicated English jammed with technical jargons, fitted with piles of figures & tables bound in thickness, to be a "good" report. Internationally, it isn't. Expert Technical Writers would regard a quality report to be readable, defensible & usable. That means the contents should be written in Plain English where even laymen can understand. After all, most Arborist Reports are prepared for laymen reading anyway (the public at large). Filling it with jargons & technicalities may simply lose the audience & confuse them, unless this is the intention. A good report would convey complicated ideas in simple language to convince the readers. The readers should be able to use the information without keep on referring back to the author for clarification. The report is then "usable". Again, what's the point of producing a report which has no use but just piles of papers & graphics??

It takes great training & skills to learn how to write a good Booklet Report. In ISA HK/China, we call this Technical Writing. Technical Writing originates from composing Law Prose in North America. The closest in HK may be the Technical Circulars & Govt Gazettes, although those are written in a conventional British administrative language. That may not apply to scientific writing like the Arborist Report.

Our IPA class of membership (http://isahkchina.blogspot.com/2010/04/isa-hkchina-hk-tree-news-14410-report.html) requires the IPA to have produced a minimum of 3 Arborist Reports without being challenged, possessing 'A' Level in English Language & 'O' Level/GCSE in Law. We require our IPA to have the corner stones to produce quality Arborist Reports. Becoming an IPA is only the first step to learn how to write good Arborist Report. There are many areas of expertise to master before the IPA can really stand up in Court.

If the Arborist Profession is to be respected by our society, the ability to produce quality Arborist Report is important. To be able to fill in a "Form Report" does not mean the Arborist can write a Letter Report or, to a further hand, a Booklet Report. A good Arborist Report should be simple, precise & concise. Verbosity & vagueness appear to the local culprit in report-writing.

ISA HK/China will guide our profession to join international requirements in report-writing step by step, hopefully. However, the individual Arborists must also prepare themselves with good communication skills & basic legal knowledge, in order to learn.

best regards,

Sammy Au
Station Manager

"If a tree is not designed, installed, maintained & inspected properly, it is likely to become a liability rather than an asset."

"Trees are good for the community. Trees need care like human beings. Arborists are the Tree Care Professionals."

寶翠園樟樹暫免斬 專家指樹藝師檢查粗糙

西環寶翠園管理公司原計劃昨日斬除被驗出白蟻的樟樹,但樹專家詹志勇看過管理公司聘請的樹藝師驗樹報告後,認為報告馬虎,管理公司聽勸再驗,暫停斬樹計劃。

【專訊】薄扶林道寶翠園平台一棵有近80年歷史的樟樹,屋苑管理公司較早前聘樹藝師評估後本擬於昨日斬除,惟樹木專家到場觀察及看過驗樹報告,認為報告「馬虎」,樟樹未必無得救,管理公司遂暫停「殺樹」,事件反映市面上的樹藝師驗樹報告參差。

該樟樹位於寶翠園於薄扶林的平台,樹高約15米,主樹幹直徑粗約1米,樹齡約80年。住客邱女士說,得悉管理公屋以樟樹受白蟻侵蝕,有倒塌危險為由而準備斬樹,遂求助樹專家詹志勇。

港大地理系講座教授詹志勇表示,前日到場觀察發現樹木生長情不太理想,大量石屎密封樹根,主樹幹部分枯萎,似病得頗嚴重。惟樹木頑強掙扎,從樹木「自救」的數枝水橫枝看來,生長得頗為健康,似乎仍有生存機會。

管理公司請教詹志勇

管理公司本計劃昨日斬除樹木,惟有關公司在行動前一刻致電詹志勇請教,詹看過有關樹木報告,發現管理公司聘請的樹藝師對樟樹的檢查粗糙,未真正反映樹是否「無得救」,亦無用膠頭槌來驗定樹幹是否被白蟻蝕至空心,遂請管理公司將樹木徹底檢驗後才斷生死。寶翠園管理公司高級管業經理陳先生證實,已暫停對該棵樹斬伐工程,但對於為何將樟樹「處決」暫停則無可奉告。